Jonathan Jones writing in the Guardian (’A painting is worth a thousand moving images‘) stirs up a hornets nest of comments by asserting that the still image (painting and photography etc) is inherently better than video art. He feels that there’s too much video art in galleries and that too often it recycles the ideas and images that are better server by the film and TV industry.
As an artist I find one of the greatest pleasures is working directly with pigments on the physical medium of the canvas, an option that is denied to the video artist. By extension, one of the things I enjoy most about viewing art is the sight of the physical surface of the canvas - perhaps ridged and pitted with paint, brushstrokes and finger prints. And perhaps that’s why video art doesn’t work for me - it’s too far removed from real life.





Recent Comments