I’m in the middle of painting a portrait commission for a client. Portrait commissions are (usually) a joy and this one is no exception. Like most commissions, I’m being asked to create a likeness from a selection of photographs. I suppose that a hundred years ago I’d have to work directly from the model, over a large number of sittings. These days photographs are almost the norm. People ask me if its possible to get a real likeness from photos, or if photograph somehow taints the finished painting.
Well, I guess that you’d expect me to say that, no, the use of a photo has no effect on the finished painting. And you’d be right, that’s exactly my point of view. On the contrary, I think the filter of an intervening photograph can be a liberating experience for the artist.
Why can this be true? Too often as an artist I become a slave to the accurate representation of nature. When painting a landscape outside the studio, I often find the need to finish the painting off in the studio because the original is too beautiful, or complex, to interpret. By returning to the studio I allow my subconscious mind to work on the painting away from the tyranny of the subject.
A photograph has the same effect as a return to the studio, it remove the artist from the subject just enough to allow true artistic interpretation. Of course, this is a tightrope, and a move too far away from a likeness would be disastrous for a portrait commission, but walking a tightrope between success and disaster is a very constructive path for an artist.
You can find out more details about the portrait commission process and prices here.




Recent Comments